2024/06/14
Relationship between diamond shine and cut | Is 3EX really the strongest? [Shock] The shine of the diamond, in fact, cannot be told just by cutting! ?
"On the net
Cut: 3 Excellent cut
Clarity: S 1
It was information that the diamond was the best cospa, and the appearance of the appearance could be obtained at the top level. Is this about the correct information? "
The question came.
I've been talking several times so far,
The shine is correct, depending on the conditions.
Retailers may advertise 3EX cuts as "the most beautiful" to pursue profits, but this is not necessarily true.
The fact that 3EX shines is mathematically calculated, and when cut with this proportion, the light that comes in is strong, reflected, and shines, but it is assumed that there is no scratches or inclusion. It is a calculated grade made.
In the case of diamonds with incoming and scratched, such as SI and L class, SI and I -class are not reflected as calculated, because light is disturbed by scratches and incoming items. There are a lot of good and VERY GOOD that are more beautiful than 3EX.
Retailers say that EX and 3EX are more beautiful because they want to sell high and make a profit, but this is a lie.
Like us, only a company that cuts diamonds from a rough stone, I can only know the truth, so I think it is inevitable.
In fact, in Japan, we are the only company that buys and cuts rough stones.
As calculated, 3EX shines, the worst is VS-1 or higher.
Indeed, only IF and FL give the best shine as calculated.
For this reason, in fact, almost all of the rare D's IF and D FL are cut into 3EX, but most of the I1 and Si, which are the majority of diamonds, are almost all cut. This is because there is no 3EX cut.
It is common that the I -class and SI class are not as shine as good, even if they cut them to 3EX.
We cut at the factory every day and witness it.
So, it's a lie that 3EX is good and shining in Si, and it's probably a lie, and probably, I looked at the information written by the person I wanted to sell, and copied it. I think.
The world of diamonds is a self -proclaimed professional, 99.99%of us, from us.
I don't really know anything.
It is a sale of the story I heard from a person.
We have companies, factories, and bases in Japan, Hong Kong, China, India, and the total number of diamonds is usually tens of thousands.
The information on the Internet is not very reliable.
This is not limited to diamonds, but I write on the net what is convenient for ourselves.
please note.
Back to Blog
Cut: 3 Excellent cut
Clarity: S 1
It was information that the diamond was the best cospa, and the appearance of the appearance could be obtained at the top level. Is this about the correct information? "
The question came.
I've been talking several times so far,
The shine is correct, depending on the conditions.
Retailers may advertise 3EX cuts as "the most beautiful" to pursue profits, but this is not necessarily true.
The fact that 3EX shines is mathematically calculated, and when cut with this proportion, the light that comes in is strong, reflected, and shines, but it is assumed that there is no scratches or inclusion. It is a calculated grade made.
In the case of diamonds with incoming and scratched, such as SI and L class, SI and I -class are not reflected as calculated, because light is disturbed by scratches and incoming items. There are a lot of good and VERY GOOD that are more beautiful than 3EX.
Retailers say that EX and 3EX are more beautiful because they want to sell high and make a profit, but this is a lie.
Like us, only a company that cuts diamonds from a rough stone, I can only know the truth, so I think it is inevitable.
In fact, in Japan, we are the only company that buys and cuts rough stones.
As calculated, 3EX shines, the worst is VS-1 or higher.
Indeed, only IF and FL give the best shine as calculated.
For this reason, in fact, almost all of the rare D's IF and D FL are cut into 3EX, but most of the I1 and Si, which are the majority of diamonds, are almost all cut. This is because there is no 3EX cut.
It is common that the I -class and SI class are not as shine as good, even if they cut them to 3EX.
We cut at the factory every day and witness it.
So, it's a lie that 3EX is good and shining in Si, and it's probably a lie, and probably, I looked at the information written by the person I wanted to sell, and copied it. I think.
The world of diamonds is a self -proclaimed professional, 99.99%of us, from us.
I don't really know anything.
It is a sale of the story I heard from a person.
We have companies, factories, and bases in Japan, Hong Kong, China, India, and the total number of diamonds is usually tens of thousands.
The information on the Internet is not very reliable.
This is not limited to diamonds, but I write on the net what is convenient for ourselves.
please note.
