2024/06/14
Relationship between diamond brilliance and cut | Is 3EX really the strongest? [Shocking] The brilliance of a diamond cannot be explained just by its cut! ?
"On the internet,
Cut: 3 excellent cuts
Clarity: S 1
I was told that this diamond is the most cost-effective and that you can get one with the highest level of brilliance, but is this information generally correct? ”
A question came up.
I've talked about this several times, but
It is true that 3EX has the best shine, depending on the conditions.
In the interest of profit, retailers often promote the 3EX cut as "the prettiest," but this is not necessarily true.
When we say that 3EX shines, it is mathematically calculated that when it is cut with these proportions, the light that comes in will strongly reflect and shine, but this is a calculated grade that assumes that there are no scratches or inclusions.
If the diamond has inclusions or scratches, such as SI or L class, the light will be hindered by the scratches or inclusions and will not reflect as calculated, so there are many SI and I class GOOD and VERY GOOD diamonds that are more beautiful than 3EX.
Retailers say that EX and 3EX are more beautiful because they want to sell at a high price and make a profit, but this is a lie.
I think it can't be helped because only companies like us that cut diamonds from rough stones know the truth.
In fact, we are the only company in Japan that buys and cuts raw stones.
As calculated, the lowest 3EX will shine is VS-1 or higher.
In reality, only IF and FL produce the best shine as calculated.
For this reason, in reality, almost all of the ultra-rare D IF and D FL are cut to 3EX, but the vast majority of diamonds, I1 and SI, are almost never cut to 3EX.
Even if you go out of your way to cut I class or SI class to 3EX, it often doesn't shine as well as GOOD.
We cut at the factory every day and see this with our own eyes.
Therefore, it is a lie to say that 3EX has good cost performance and shines at SI, and I think that the person who wanted to sell it probably wrote the information, or saw other information and copied it.
In the world of diamonds, 99.99% of people who call themselves professionals are amateurs to us.
I don't really understand anything.
I'm just picking up stories I've heard from people.
We have companies, factories, and bases in Japan, Hong Kong, China, and India, and the total number of diamonds is usually in the tens of thousands.
Information on the internet is not very reliable.
This is not limited to diamonds, but we write on the internet what is convenient for us.
please note.
ブログに戻る
Cut: 3 excellent cuts
Clarity: S 1
I was told that this diamond is the most cost-effective and that you can get one with the highest level of brilliance, but is this information generally correct? ”
A question came up.
I've talked about this several times, but
It is true that 3EX has the best shine, depending on the conditions.
In the interest of profit, retailers often promote the 3EX cut as "the prettiest," but this is not necessarily true.
When we say that 3EX shines, it is mathematically calculated that when it is cut with these proportions, the light that comes in will strongly reflect and shine, but this is a calculated grade that assumes that there are no scratches or inclusions.
If the diamond has inclusions or scratches, such as SI or L class, the light will be hindered by the scratches or inclusions and will not reflect as calculated, so there are many SI and I class GOOD and VERY GOOD diamonds that are more beautiful than 3EX.
Retailers say that EX and 3EX are more beautiful because they want to sell at a high price and make a profit, but this is a lie.
I think it can't be helped because only companies like us that cut diamonds from rough stones know the truth.
In fact, we are the only company in Japan that buys and cuts raw stones.
As calculated, the lowest 3EX will shine is VS-1 or higher.
In reality, only IF and FL produce the best shine as calculated.
For this reason, in reality, almost all of the ultra-rare D IF and D FL are cut to 3EX, but the vast majority of diamonds, I1 and SI, are almost never cut to 3EX.
Even if you go out of your way to cut I class or SI class to 3EX, it often doesn't shine as well as GOOD.
We cut at the factory every day and see this with our own eyes.
Therefore, it is a lie to say that 3EX has good cost performance and shines at SI, and I think that the person who wanted to sell it probably wrote the information, or saw other information and copied it.
In the world of diamonds, 99.99% of people who call themselves professionals are amateurs to us.
I don't really understand anything.
I'm just picking up stories I've heard from people.
We have companies, factories, and bases in Japan, Hong Kong, China, and India, and the total number of diamonds is usually in the tens of thousands.
Information on the internet is not very reliable.
This is not limited to diamonds, but we write on the internet what is convenient for us.
please note.
